Alfa Bravo

Updated June 3, 2008
Current conferences have not changed their formats much in the last 20 years, they are still mostly about one-way communication. They look like television in the 80s: a guy telling you what is happening and showing you slides or videos about it. Your role as a delegate is to sit still, perhaps take some notes and hope that the speaker will disclose something you do not know already.
These types of events could still be fun and useful socially, but it is a very inefficient way to communicate, inspire and create real learning. And it is totally out of synch with all other forms of modern media in the internet age, where it is about two-way communication and the users are active participants in creating experiences together with the publishers.

Conferences 1.0
They way most conferences today are organized:

1. The web site is used only for listing the program and signing up the delegates.
2. As soon as the conference starts, the web site is dead.
3. In better 1.0 conferences the web site links to the presenter’s slide shows a week or two after the conference, unfortunately there are just a few that still have the time then.
4. There are no speaker videos on the web site, for fear that it will make people enjoy them at home instead of paying to be at the conference. (But the TED conference made a huge success when they dared oppose this wisdom and started publishing all the speeches online)
5. They drag on for 2-3 days with a stiff dinner or drinks “party” sponsored by a company that you barely know about and where the delegates hang out with their friends.
6. They are all about key-notes, a speaker presenting to the audience, top-down, one-to-many communication with no participation from the audience other than the usual awkward questions from people that want to show off themselves.
7. They are huge, with thousands of delegates, making it very hard to make contact with new people.

Conferences 2.0
My vision of conferences that are more engaging and immersive for both the delegates and the speakers:

1. They are small, 50 -150 people. Smaller is usually more productive. But once per year or so it could be nice to attend a really big event, perhaps with more focus on relaxing and re-charging.
2. They use online tools to let delegates present themselves and their interests and search for other people to meet at the conference.
3. They are concentrated to one day and evening where everything is designed to catalyze business networking
4. There are multiple screens around the stage and the rooms, showing the speakers as well as the back channels
5. Consider lending all delegates a wireless laptop for feedback and input
   (you think this is expensive? look at the €260 Asus Eee mini-laptop!)
6. They use online back channels, (services like Twitter, Jaiku), as well as blogs and discussion forums that are open from long before the conference
7. The conference web site is the central collection place both before, during and after the conference for inspiring information, links to the speaker sites, blogs, back channels etc.
8. Everything that happens during the conference is on the web site, (including all the speaker videos), since:
   1. it will inspire many more to come the next time to experience the immersive networking and participation of the physical event.
   2. it is a useful tool for the delegates to use when they summarize and report back their experiences after the event.
9. They consist mostly of moderated discussions on stage with one or several speakers, and many examples are shown of what is being discussed.
10. They encourage the delegates to blog during the conference, and linking to all the blogs on the conference web site.

I recommend reading Seth Godin’s blog post “The new standard for meetings and conferences“.

Excerpt: “Here’s what a speaker owes an audience that travels to engage in person: more than they could get by just reading the transcript.
And here’s what a conference organizer owes the attendees: surprise, juxtaposition, drama, engagement, souvenirs and just possibly, excitement.”

                 

(1 votes, average: 4 out of 5)

 Loading ...

The LeWeb3 was one of the most professionally produced conferences I have attended in several ways.
The video projection was the best I have ever seen and the audio quality was top notch with very engaging musical intros.
I also liked the schedule with lots of time for networking in the coffe and lunch breaks. The lunch offering was a totally staggering buffet of french gourmet cuisine at it best. A two hour lunch break with hundreds of small dishes makes it easy to relax and network!

Loic LeMeur and his wife Geraldine, organizers of LeWeb3

Most of the speakers were very inspiring and I liked the mix of key notes and panel discussions. But the conference format was still 1.0, (OK, more like 1.4) it is now time at least for internet conferences to live like they preach and move to 2.0! (See my separate blog about this.)

Some of my notes from LeWeb3:

Hans Rosling
his presentations at TED have made him world famous, don’t miss them!
“Storytelling works! There are 10 000 watchers for every clicker”
“Just putting facts on the internet does not work, storytelling does!”

Panel: The Internet’s impact on design
This was a somewhat confused panel discussion, as it consisted of very different types of peope that did not know anything about each other.
Rafi Haladjan, the creator of the smart online rabbit Nabaztag (rabbit in Armenian). This rabbit is much more interesting than it looks, since it is a good example of an important trend: EVERYTHING will be internet-connected, not just computers and mobiles. The moderator missed this trend and Rafi should have demoed the rabbit. (I have just ordered one to get the feeling)

Panel: Monetization in the Web 2.0 world
A trio of entrereneurs presented their models, it showed just how difficult it is to come up with ways to earn real revenue.
A successful blogger mentioned that he made $25 last month from Adsense ads on his blog…
Another entrepreneur reported having bought a Facebook ad campaign with 1 million impressions that generated just 3 (three) clicks.
My conclusion: Nobody knows what will be the keys to monetization, but ads as the only revenue model is not working now and probably not in the future either, as the competition for ad dollars increase tremendously.

Panel: making things personal: investing
Morten Lund, Danish entrepreneur and investor
“I believe in revenue and profit” (applause from the audience).
“I don’t invest in porn and entrepreneurs that are assholes”
“I go for stupid things that make real money online like nails, eye glasses, socks”

Another investor gave the tip: “Don’t invest in companies selling to big companies, since big companies never buy anything! They have like 18 month selling cycles…”

Why Enterprise 2.0… isn’t
JP Rangaswami from British Telecom Design was very inspiring:
” I don’t worry about Google’s policy of letting their employees use 20% of their time for their own projects.
I worry about the other 80%! Why do they still have the punch-clock thinking?
At my office, we focus on the output rather than the input!. What do I care when or where my people are doing their work?”

Evolving entrepreneurship
Martin Varsavsky came on stage with the message that there are indeed investement opportunities also in Europe, and that our 22 languages can be turned into something good. He also mentioned that 17% of Googles total revenue comes from the UK market alone!
His blog is a must fo everyone interested in internet-related entreprenership and international business.

The Future of TV
This is my own favourite topic, excellently moderated by Jeff Pulver, http://pulver.com/ a very energetic and typical American (Hawaii shirt and all)
“TV got the idea of Web 2.0 first and they have corrupted it! Using audience phone-ins and user-generated content such as American Idol…”
Also in the panel was the experienced blogger Robert Scoble, his videoblog at http://www.podtech.net/scobleshow/

Other interesting video services that were mentioned:
Asterpix, a new, highly interesting video site reviving the old concept of “Hypervideo”, (interactive video). There are clickable areas in the video that lead to notes and links. You can also see annotations in a list and use them to navigate inside a video clip. Very smart!
http://www.blogtv.com/
http://www.kyte.tv/
http://dotsub.com/

Janus Friis
(co-founder of Kazaa, Skype and Joost) made one his his rare appearances. Being an unusually shy Dane, he gave an inspiring, laid back and personal tale of the serendipity of his entreprenurship, from Kazaa to Skype to Skype. He and Niclas have disrupted the music industrcy and the telephony industry and they are now re-inventing television, not a bad feat! See also his blog

Also interesting is the fact that they have invented nothing new, they “just” saw that nobody was using the existing technologies to make really simple solutions and then market them. When Skype was launched, it had been possible for years to talk via MSN chat, but Microsoft had not realized that this possibility could be used to replace telephony.
But Joost is a more complex service, since it depends on offering good content and therefore deals with hundreds of programme rights holders around the world. But the biggest obstacle to overcome before Joost is a Skype-like success will probably be to make people more active in their viewing habits. Coach-potatoes are more common today than the stats show, even among the young!

Also, there is a link missing that can enable us to watch Joost on our big-screen TV in company of our friends and relatives. I see two ways for this:
1. come up with a simple Joost set-top box that connects to the TV (or have Apple integrate Joost in a smarter Apple TV model)
2. Integrate Joost into the digital cable TV offering from the triple-play operators.

The only mishap at LeWeb3 was the strange ending. The last two sesssions was somewhat disconnected from the conference topic and the speakers suddenly found themselves alone on the stage. One of the speakers that I wanted to hear, (David Weinberger) was inexplicably dropped from appearing on stage. All this caused the energy in the room to drop at the end and people left the conference with a feeling of anti-climax.
A grande finale session with uplifting foresights into the future was sorely missed!

                 

(1 votes, average: 5 out of 5)

 Loading ...